Home Up Contents FAQ Search

Primary CMB
Up Next

 

Community
International
Site Testing
Science Goals
Instrument Design
Budget & Schedule

Primary cosmic microwave background anisotropy at arcminute scales

At angular scales near 0.5o, standard cosmological models predict relatively large anisotropy caused by an acoustic "bounce" that occurred before recombination. The spatial frequency at which this peak occurs depends on the fundamental cosmological parameter, W. Additional smaller peaks are expected at multiples of the peak spatial frequency. Present CMBR observations show a clear maximum in the anisotropy spectrum at a spatial scale somewhere near 1o, but the spectrum lacks detail and the harmonic peaks at smaller scales have not yet been seen. 


Cosmic Microwave Backround Angular Power Spectrum  (after a figure by M. White). The experimental state of CMB anisotropy measurements as of May 1999. Data from the highly successful Boomerang flight of December 1998 were not yet available. Detected power is plotted as a function of angular scale (expressed as spherical harmonic number). The error bars are a combination of measurement noise and sampling error that results from limited sky coverage. The UCSB, Python, and Viper observations were made from the South Pole. The Viper results shown here represent 10% of all Viper data collected to date. Other experiments shown are Saskatoon, Tenerife, BAM, COBE, MASM, MAX, CAT, OVRO, and VLA. Note that the millimeter-wave single-dish results from the South Pole are competitive with centimeter-wave single-dish, interferometers, and balloon-borne single-dish experiments. The power spectrum for a standard cold dark matter (sCDM) model (H0= 100 km s-1 Mpc-1, WB = 0.05, W = 1,  L = 0) is overlaid as a solid line. The small square boxes near the top of the figure indicate the location of the acoustic peak for values of W  between 0.1 and 1. The peak at  l = 200 corresponds to 0.5o on the sky. The dotted line and question mark indicate that the shape of the acoustic peak beyond l > 1000 is sensitive to the conditions of the first recombination and possible subsequent re-ionization. These processes are poorly understood. The horizontal bars at the bottom show the range of spatial scales at which the Planck satellite and the SPST are sensitive to primary anisotropy.

The SPST will study the damping tail region at arcminute scales, providing a test of the acoustic oscillation model and providing measurements of peak positions that will augment the lower spatial frequency information obtained with meter-class telescopes. The shape of the damping tail is a manifestation of the speed at which the recombination process occurs, and the degree to which recombination is mixed with re-ionization. To study primary anisotropy at arcminute angular scales, it will be important to simultaneously understand the secondary contribution to anisotropy due to Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (S-Z) distortion in galaxy clusters between the recombination last scattering surface and the observer. Because of the low sky noise available at the Pole, the SPST can be used over a wide range of frequencies, including the 200-300 GHz range of frequencies required to allow spectral separation of thermal S-Z effect from primary anisotropy.


Simulated Fine Angular Scale CMBR Image (by J. Peterson). Simulated CMB structure on a twenty-five square degree region of sky. The faint extended structure is primary CMB anisotropy, while the strong localized sources are secondary anisotropy due to the Sunyeav-Zel'dovich effect in galaxy clusters. In this model, S-Z signal dominates at fine angular scales. The simulation does not include the S-Z filaments expected from the collapse of 100 Mpc structures. 

Scaling the results of Python and Viper, the SPST will achieve 10 ľK or better temperature sensitivity per pixel at spatial scales between 103 < l < 104. Among all telescopes that could be used for CMB measurements at spatial scales in this range, the SPST is likely to be the most sensitive single-dish: it will not be possible to fly 10m apertures in balloons, airplanes, or spacecraft in the near future and the millimeter- and submillimeter-wave sky noise at South Pole is excellent.


A Comparison of Telescopes for CMB (after a figure by J. Peterson). Shown in angular scale, l, vs. observing frequency, n, are science targets: CMB polarization, Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect, dust emission by primeval galaxies, and the fine structure line of ionized carbon from galaxies. Also shown are the domains of three instruments: the Planck spacecraft, the SPST, and the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA). The jagged curve [red] is a comparison of atmospheric noise to noise in a spacecraft environment. On this curve, the South Pole winter atmospheric emission fluctuations equal the photon fluctuations in a spacecraft environment (assumed to be caused by the brightness of the sky plus photons emitted from a 1% emissivity 70 K surface). Observations above and to the left of this curve derive a noise benefit from being in space. Cluster S-Z observations fall to the right of the noise boundary, and are best done with the SPST. The NASA Cosmic Microwave Background Future Missions Working Group recommends that most CMB polarization observations be done from space, but high spatial frequency CMB polarization can also be measured with the SPST. Although they are unresolved, the SPST will have significant sensitivity to dust emission by primeval galaxies and high-redshift ionized carbon. 

 

Send mail to help@cfa.harvard.edu with questions or comments about this web site.
Last modified: April 22, 2000