Total number of queued jobs/tasks/slots: 3/2,395/4,468
67 users have/had running or queued jobs over the past 7 days, 84 over the past 15 days.
100 over the past 30 days.
Click on the tabs to view each section, on the plots to view larger versions.
You can view the current cluster snapshot sorted by name, no. cpu, usage, load
or memory, and
view the past load for 7, or 15, or 30 days as well as highlight a given user by
selecting the corresponding options in the drop down menus.
{}
This page was last updated on Friday, 27-Feb-2026 15:42:04 EST
with mk-webpage.pl ver. 7.3/1 (Oct 2025/SGK) in 0:56.
Warnings
Oversubscribed Jobs
As of Fri Feb 27 15:37:18 EST 2026 (13 oversubscribed jobs, showing no more than 3 per user)
Total running (PEs/jobs) = 2067/652, 3 queued (jobs), showing only oversubscribed jobs (cpu% > 133% & age > 1h) for all users.
jobID name user age nPEs cpu% queue node taskID
12214486 angs34-5 uribeje +4:20 8 163.1% uThM.q 65-24
12214488 angsall uribeje +4:20 8 180.7% uThM.q 65-11
12228249 phyBuc2_RM gouldingt 12:35 4 142.1% mThC.q 65-27
12228350 denovo_assembly chippsa 02:30 32 156.7% mThC.q 65-03
12228351 denovo_assembly chippsa 02:27 32 374.3% mThC.q 75-04
12228352 denovo_assembly chippsa 02:23 32 167.4% mThC.q 65-26
(more by chippsa)
⇒ Equivalent to 461.6 overused CPUs: 340 CPUs used at 235.8% on average.
To see them all use:
'q+ -osub -u chippsa' (10)
Inefficient Jobs
As of Fri Feb 27 15:37:25 EST 2026 (12 inefficient jobs, showing no more than 3 per user)
Total running (PEs/jobs) = 2058/652, 3 queued (jobs), showing only inefficient jobs (cpu% < 33% & age > 1h) for all users.
jobID name user age nPEs cpu% queue node taskID
12190422 stairwayAZ.job byerlyp +11:05 5 20.0% lThM.q 64-17
12195552 stairwayNE.job byerlyp +11:02 5 19.9% lThM.q 76-04
12198833 stairwayCAR.job byerlyp +10:04 5 19.9% lThM.q 76-14
12226716 sansibia_spades nelsonjo +1:01 10 24.6% mThM.q 65-06
12228309 Vitis_AutoIndex niez 02:00 32 5.0% uTxlM.rq 93-05
12228328 AI_angsd2_arg.j beckerm 04:12 8 24.3% mThM.q 65-19
12228337 plume-summary-p qzhu 03:20 10 10.4% lThM.q 65-30
12228362 getorganelle_ar athalappila 02:16 8 16.5% mThM.q 84-01 30
12228362 getorganelle_ar athalappila 02:16 8 23.6% mThM.q 76-08 51
12228362 getorganelle_ar athalappila 02:16 8 21.8% mThM.q 65-05 57
(more by athalappila)
⇒ Equivalent to 96.0 underused CPUs: 115 CPUs used at 16.5% on average.
To see them all use:
'q+ -ineff -u athalappila' (5)
As of Fri Feb 27 15:37:32 EST 2026
1 job waiting for breusingc:
jobID jobName user age nPEs memReqd queue taskID
--------- --------------- ---------------- ------ ---- -------- ------ -------
12226547 metaspades breusingc +1:05 16 0.0 mThM.q 251-318:1
quota rule resource=value/limit %used
------------------- ------------------------------- ------
max_hM_slots_per_user/2 slots=320/585 54.7% for breusingc in queue mThM.q
max_slots_per_user/1 slots=320/840 38.1% for breusingc
max_mem_res_per_user/2 mem_res=0.010k/8.944T 0.0% for breusingc in queue uThM.q
------------------- ------------------------------- ------
1 job waiting for castanedaricos:
jobID jobName user age nPEs memReqd queue taskID
--------- --------------- ---------------- ------ ---- -------- ------ -------
12219855 assembly_array castanedaricos +3:00 40 400.0 lThM.q 80-106:1
quota rule resource=value/limit %used
------------------- ------------------------------- ------
max_hM_slots_per_user/3 slots=80/390 20.5% for castanedaricos in queue lThM.q
max_slots_per_user/1 slots=80/840 9.5% for castanedaricos
max_mem_res_per_user/2 mem_res=800.0G/8.944T 8.7% for castanedaricos in queue uThM.q
------------------- ------------------------------- ------
1 job waiting for morrisseyd:
jobID jobName user age nPEs memReqd queue taskID
--------- --------------- ---------------- ------ ---- -------- ------ -------
12228388 alignfasta-ARRA morrisseyd 00:40 1 16.0 mThM.q 744-3040:1
quota rule resource=value/limit %used
------------------- ------------------------------- ------
max_mem_res_per_user/2 mem_res=8.938T/8.944T 99.9% for morrisseyd in queue uThM.q
max_hM_slots_per_user/2 slots=572/585 97.8% for morrisseyd in queue mThM.q
max_slots_per_user/1 slots=572/840 68.1% for morrisseyd
------------------- ------------------------------- ------
Overall Quota Usage
quota rule resource=value/limit %used
------------------- ------------------------------- ------
max_hC_slots_per_user/3 slots=251/431 58.2% for hpc in queue lThC.q
blast2GO/1 slots=41/110 37.3% for *
total_mem_res/2 mem_res=13.21T/35.78T 36.9% for * in queue uThM.q
total_slots/1 slots=2060/5960 34.6% for *
max_slots_per_user/1 slots=251/840 29.9% for hpc
total_mem_res/3 mem_res=1.562T/7.874T 19.8% for * in queue uTxlM.rq
total_mem_res/1 mem_res=3.574T/39.94T 8.9% for * in queue uThC.q
max_mem_res_per_user/1 mem_res=2.000G/9.985T 0.0% for hpc in queue uThC.q
Memory Usage
Reserved Memory, All High-Memory Queues
Select length:
Current Memory Quota Usage
As of Fri Feb 27 15:37:33 EST 2026
quota rule resource=value/limit %used filter
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
total_mem_res/1 mem_res=3.574T/39.94T 8.9% for * in queue uThC.q
total_mem_res/2 mem_res=13.21T/35.78T 36.9% for * in queue uThM.q
total_mem_res/3 mem_res=1.562T/7.874T 19.8% for * in queue uTxlM.rq
Current Memory Usage by Compute Node, High Memory Nodes Only
Limit slots for all users together
users * to slots=5960
users * queues sThC.q,lThC.q,mThC.q,uThC.q to slots=5176
users * queues sThM.q,mThM.q,lThM.q,uThM.q to slots=4680
users * queues uTxlM.rq to slots=536
users * queues sTgpu.q,mTgpu.q,lTgpu.q to slots=104
Limit slots/user for xlMem restricted queue
users {*} queues {uTxlM.rq} to slots=536
Limit total reserved memory for all users per queue type
users * queues sThC.q,mThC.q,lThC.q,uThC.q to mem_res=40902G
users * queues sThM.q,mThM.q,lThM.q,uThM.q to mem_res=36637G
users * queues uTxlM.rq to mem_res=8063G
Limit slots/user for interactive (qrsh) queues
users {*} queues {qrsh.iq} to slots=16
Limit GPUs for all users in GPU queues to the avail no of GPUs
users * queues {sTgpu.q,mTgpu.q,lTgpu.q,qgpu.iq} to GPUS=8
Limit GPUs per user in all the GPU queues
users {*} queues sTgpu.q,mTgpu.q,lTgpu.q,qgpu.iq to GPUS=4
Limit GPUs per user in each GPU queues
users {*} queues {sTgpu.q} to GPUS=4
users {*} queues {mTgpu.q} to GPUS=3
users {*} queues {lTgpu.q} to GPUS=2
users {*} queues {qgpu.iq} to GPUS=1
Limit to set aside a slot for blast2GO
users * queues !lTb2g.q hosts {@b2g-hosts} to slots=110
users * queues lTb2g.q hosts {@b2g-hosts} to slots=1
users {*} queues lTb2g.q hosts {@b2g-hosts} to slots=1
Limit total bigtmp concurrent request per user
users {*} to big_tmp=25
Limit total number of idl licenses per user
users {*} to idlrt_license=102
Limit slots for io queue per user
users {*} queues {lTIO.sq} to slots=8
Limit slots for io queue per user
users {*} queues {lTWFM.sq} to slots=2
Limit the number of concurrent jobs per user for some queues
users {*} queues {uTxlM.rq} to no_concurrent_jobs=3
users {*} queues {lTIO.sq} to no_concurrent_jobs=2
users {*} queues {lWFM.sq} to no_concurrent_jobs=1
users {*} queues {qrsh.iq} to no_concurrent_jobs=4
users {*} queues {qgpu.iq} to no_concurrent_jobs=1
Limit slots/user in hiCPU queues
users {*} queues {sThC.q} to slots=840
users {*} queues {mThC.q} to slots=840
users {*} queues {lThC.q} to slots=431
users {*} queues {uThC.q} to slots=143
Limit slots/user for hiMem queues
users {*} queues {sThM.q} to slots=840
users {*} queues {mThM.q} to slots=585
users {*} queues {lThM.q} to slots=390
users {*} queues {uThM.q} to slots=73
Limit reserved memory per user for specific queues
users {*} queues sThC.q,mThC.q,lThC.q,uThC.q to mem_res=10225G
users {*} queues sThM.q,mThM.q,lThM.q,uThM.q to mem_res=9159G
users {*} queues uTxlM.rq to mem_res=8063G
Limit slots/user for all queues
users {*} to slots=840
You can view plots of disk use vs time, for the past 7, 30, or 120 days;
as well as
plots of disk usage by user, or
by device (for the past 90 or 240 days respectively).
Notes
Capacity shows % disk space full and % of inodes used.
When too many small files are written on a disk, the file system can become full because it is
unable to keep track of new files.
The % of inodes should be lower or comparable to the % of disk space used.
If it is much larger, the disk can become unusable before it gets full.