James F. Babb

Ok, so nobody's perfect!

I've tried to acknowledge below those ever-vigilant readers who've pointed out errors; look for this type size.

On p. 4, first column, line 8: ζ=10

The numerical pre-factor in Eq. (9) should read:

7.80×10

A tip of the hat to Mark Zammit for pointing this error out.

Title as printed: replace "force" with "forces"

p. 192, Eq. (3): in the numerator, replace one "A" with "B"

p. 193, Eq. (8): should read
α_{A} (ω) E_{B → A}(ω,R) E_{b}(ω)

p. 197, 10th line from bottom: replace "present" with "presents"

p. 3569, table II: Some of the exponents given
are wrong, corrected values are given below.
("o.k." denotes that the published value is correct):

R/a_{0} | F_{6} |
F_{3} | |

1.5[4] | o.k. | 9.193[-2] | |

2.0[4] | o.k. | 6.957[-2] | |

2.5[4] | o.k. | 5.590[-2] | |

3.0[4] | o.k. | 4.670[-2] | |

7.0[4] | 6.056[-2] | 2.011[-2] | |

1.0[5] | 4.247[-2] | 1.408[-2] | |

1.0[6] | o.k. | o.k. |

A tip of the hat to Robin Côté for pointing this error out.

p. 17, eq.(3): The subscript "1" on the LHS should read "i"

p. 22, eq.(20): Interchange the subscripts "1" and "i" on the RHS.

p. 22, eq.(22): Interchange the subscripts "1" and "i" on the RHS.

p. 27, table 9: The first line of the table should read

H_{2}^{+} | H_{2}^{+} | 1.40520 | 0.60380 | 0.60380 | 0.27625 | 3.2836 | Present,R=2.0_{c}a_{0} |

A tip of the hat to Valerio Magnasco and Massimo Ottonelli,

p. 28, Ref.[28]: "Bokowski" should read "Bukowski"

*Continuum absorption of
vibrationally excited* O_{2}* from 200-320 nm,*
J. F. Babb, Y. Sun, M. J. Jamieson, A. Dalgarno, and
A. C. Allison, J. Quant. Spect. Rad. Transfer, vol. 50 (1993),
pp. 579-583; Correction, ibid., vol. 51 (1994) p. 787.

Back to my home page James F. Babb

Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St., MS 14, Cambridge, MA 02138