from:	 Jonathan Weintroub 
to:	 "Young, Ken" 
cc:	 Mark Gurwell ,
         "Primiani, Rurik" ,
         Eric Keto ,
         Nimesh Patel ,
         Chunhua Qi ,
         Lars Kristensen ,
         David Wilner ,
         Qizhou Zhang ,
         Sridharan Tirupati Kumara ,
         Jun-Hui Zhao ,
         Alice Argon 
date:	 Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:05 PM
subject:	 Re: SWARM Correlator Test Track - When did the music stop?
mailed-by:	 cfa.harvard.edu

I am a bit hesitant to suggest this given that running tests take time away 
from urgent development, still: could there be a benefit to taking some more 
data in better weather, and perhaps on shorter baselines given the SMA is now compact?  
Not that the anomalies would go away, but perhaps better data would lend more 
insight as to what is going on.

Also, would it be possible to take data with a variety of integration dump rates?  
Including as fast as possible (shortest integrations)? Would this be a crude test 
of the hypothesis that improper phase tracking is responsible?

Jonathan