J. Michael Shull
University of Colorado, CASA and JILA
Boulder, CO 80309
I provide a brief review of laboratory data needs for UV, IR, and X-ray astrophysics. The scientific areas center primarily on interstellar and intergalactic matter and on active galactic nuclei. From the vantage point of observational astronomers, abundance measurements, ionization corrections, and physical diagnostics usually require accuracies better than 20%. The current level of sophisticated astrophysical modeling in these fields requires increasingly accurate rate coefficients for collisional ionization, photoionization, recombination, electron-impact excitation, resonant-line absorption, and charge exchange. Laboratory measurements and theoretical computations should both be supported. Self-consistency checks between inverse processes are desirable; for example, among photoionization, radiative recombination, and dielectronic recombination. I also comment on the need for firmer identification of the constituents and physical properties of the solid particles (dust grains, PAHs) in the interstellar medium. Because these particles potentially dominate UV absorption and photoelectric heating of the gas, and are key diagnostics in infrared emission, we need more reliable models than the simple PAH paradigm currently used.
Introduction
To this audience, there is little need to dwell on the importance of atomic data in astrophysics. Suffice it to say that nearly all astronomical inference from emission-line and absorption-line spectroscopy relies on the existence of accurate cross sections, rate coefficients, line frequencies, and related parameters about the abundant atoms, ions, and molecules in space. In this paper, I will mention a few of the most important areas for understanding galactic interstellar and intergalactic science. I will focus, in particular, on two related scientific problems that are ``drivers'' for several current and future NASA missions:
These scientific issues motivate many of the key projects on major NASA missions, particularly FUSE (the Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer), the spectrographs on Hubble Space Telescope (STIS and COS), AXAF (Advanced X-ray Astrophysics Facility), SOFIA (Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy), and SIRTF (Space Infra-Red Telescope Facility).
Scientific Issues
Astronomers are generally inclined to study the most abundant
elements, whose scientific importance is governed by a combination
of scientific factors such as abundance, accessible spectral lines,
transition strength, excitation mechanism, and diagnostic importance.
The foremost consideration is often the astrophysical abundance, which
implicates 20-25 elements spread over a number of ionization stages.
One of the virtues of the organization of this conference is
that we may discuss a broad range of wavelength bands. However,
within any given band (optical, UV, IR, X-ray) there are often
certain fundamental factors that limit the accessible elements and ion
stages. For instance, carbon is generally inaccessible in the
optical and requires either ultraviolet or infrared measurements
for direct detection. Similarly, excitation conditions
or atomic/molecular parameters often make it difficult
to detect key atoms and molecules. In the interstellar or
intergalactic gas, most atoms and ions have their resonance asbsorption
lines in the ultraviolet, particularly the 900-1200 Å region studied by FUSE. The dominant probes of baryons in
the intergalactic medium, H I and He II, are most sensitively detected
through their Ly
absorption lines, with rest wavelengths
of 1215.670 Å and 303.781 Å, and higher Lyman-series lines.
In many cases, these lines are redshifted to longer wavelengths
accessible to the HST spectrographs, as well as to FUSE.
Another example occurs in molecular gas, in which
the dominant species, H2, is best studied
through its far-ultraviolet Lyman and Werner absorption bands or through
its near-IR vibrational emission lines. However, current (ISO) and
future (SIRTF, SOFIA) instruments may be able to probe warm H2
through its weak quadrupole emission lines at 28, 17, and 12
m.
The elements of significant abundance include H and He, the dominant repositories of baryons, the abundant molecules (H2 and CO), and the heavy elements C, N, O, Ne, Mg, Si, S, and Fe (all greater than 10-5 abundance relative to hydrogen by number). Other heavy elements of lower abundance (Na, Al, P, Cl, Ar, K, Ca, Ti) are important because of the accessibility of their lines, while many heavier elements in the iron-group (Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn) have taken on renewed importance because their utility for diagnosing stellar nucleosynthetic sources. The production of selected heavy elements by certain mass ranges of stars is also significant, as astronomers attempt to relate chemical evolution to stellar progenitors, including the rates of massive star formation, supernovae, and starlight. The ``alpha-capture'' elements (O, Si, S) are especially important ties to massive star formation and Type-II supernovae, while the iron-group elements and carbon are well-tied to low-mass star formation and Type-I supernovae. The stellar source of Zn is currently is not well understood, although its ratio to Ni, Cr, and Fe is widely used as a diagnostic of the presence of interstellar dust (Zn appears not to deplete strongly onto grains).
Molecular studies are also important for UV and IR astronomy. Although H2 is the dominant molecule in interstellar space, and CO is the most frequently used species to infer molecular cloud masses, these are by no means the only molecular diagnostics. Trace molecules and molecular ions often provide excellent diagnostics of dense cloud cores, outflows from star-forming regions, and cloud chemical networks.
Finally, increasingly important diagnostics of interstellar matter and its radiative environment comes from the solid particles or dust grains. Composed of silicates, graphite, SiC, amorphous carbon, and ice mantles, these grains provide important energy transfer mechanisms from the radiation field to the gas, since they can dominate the UV absorption cross section and photoelectric heating rate of diffuse gas.
Data Needs: Ionization and Recombination
Accurate models of the ionization conditions in astrophysical plasmas, both photoionized or collisionally ionized, require an array of basic atomic data. The critical cross sections or rate coefficients include:
Details on how these rate coefficients are used may be found
in many books and review articles on atomic processes in
astrophysical nebulae and plasmas.
(e.g., Osterbrock 1989; Brickhouse 1996; Shull 1993, 1996)
Together with photoionization or collisional ionization models,
these data are used to derive the ionization
fractions, fZ,z, at a prescribed temperature T or
photoionization parameter,
.The fraction of element Z in ion stage z then provides the overall
elemental abundance. Although such
calculations usually assume ionization equilibrium
(Shull & Van Steenberg 1982; Arnaud & Rothenflug 1985;
Sutherland & Dopita 1993), many situations involve transient
plasmas out of equilibrium, such as hot, post-shock plasmas
or recombining plasmas. In equilibrium, the dominant ionization stage
is determined primarily by the ionization potential and
Boltzmann factors, and the ionization recombination rates
need only to be determined to about 20% accuracy.
However, disequilibrium plasmas depend more directly on the
normalization constant in the rate coefficients,
and 10% accuracy would be desirable to
achieve the diagnostic goals.
The most critical data needs lie primarily on the
recombination side of the equation.
Dielectronic recombination rates are not adequately
known, particularly at low temperatures,
K,
as are typical of photoionized plasmas.
This will require understanding the importance of
transitions, as well as fine-structure
effects (relativistic and spin-orbit spilitting).
In the panel discussion, we had a consensus that, for both
X-ray and UV studies, a high priority should be placed on
a comparison of experimental and theoretical measurements
of radiative and dielctronic recombination rates.
The plasma experiments may require a combination of
storage ring and ion-beam facilities.
A plasma experiment can produce a range of ions and a
UV/X-ray spectrum under controlled conditions, while
an ion-beam experiment can focus on a single species
at aparticular energy. Each of these experiments should
then be tested against the extensive close-coupling
calculations and compared to observations of spectra
from hot and photoionized plasmas.
Another important need is accurate calculations and measurements of charge-transfer rates of ions with H I. In many cases, these processes dominate the plasma neutralization. Currently, modelers must rely on theoretical calculations for charge-exchange rates. Some experimental benchmarks would be valuable.
Data Needs: Lines
Once the ionization state has been characterized, the next step is to understand the line formation physics. Since spectroscopic diagnostics come from emission lines and absorption lines, further atomic data are needed to characterize and interpret the line spectra. For absorption lines, accurate abundances usually require oscillator strengths for several lines over a range of strengths, to resolve the ambiguities of saturation (curve-of-growth). The key line parameters include:
Recent laboratory work by groups at Wisconsin and Toledo have clarified some of the f-value inconsistencies in Si II and Fe II and have made accurate measurements for Cr II, Ni II, Zn II, and Co II. In contrast to the situation five years ago (Shull 1993), the situation has improved considerably. In my talk, I mentioned a few lines that probably need more accurate f-values and collisional-excitation rates, owing to their importance in key science projects with FUSE and HST.
Data Needs: Molecular Astrophysics
Studies of molecular hydrogen will be among the new results of FUSE. The Lyman and Werner bands below 1126 Å will appear in nearly every spectrum of O stars, quasars, and other AGN. Measuring the abundances, N(J), in the rotational states j = 0,1,2... of H2 will provide information relevant to the gas kinetic temperature (from J = 0 and 1), the gas density, nH, and the ultraviolet radiation field, J1000 near 1000 Å that radiatively pumps these states. Thus, with proper modeling, we can infer the run of gas pressure and UV radiation field above the Galactic disk plane, and in the environments of massive star formation. Abundance ratios of CO/H2, combined with measurements of heavy-element abundances and UV extinction curves, can test photo-chemical models of the transition regions between diffuse clouds and dark star-forming clouds. The ratio, HD/H2, can be used to infer the cosmic-ray intensity that penetrates these regions. In addition, trace molecules (N2, O2, etc.) are often useful diagnostics of the photo-chemical models of photo-dissociation regions and translucent clouds. The data needs for these science problems include:
Data Needs: Dust Grains and PAHs
Quantitative studies of solid particles and small clusters are still in their infancy. However, the many opportunities for IR studies, as well the accurate UV spectroscopic studies now available with FUSE and HST, suggest the need for far-IR dust emissivities, absorption cross sections, and UV and IR feature identifications. Among the key programs that I mentioned in the talk are:
Summary: Long-Term Data Needs
In the earlier sections, I have emphasized key laboratory measurements and theoretical calculations in atomic/molecular astrophysics. These parameters were tied to current and scheduled NASA missions in UV, IR, and X-ray space astronomy. One of the most important overall needs that pervades all these areas is for accurate (15%) parameters to interpret the ionization equilibrium and dis-equilibrium state of hot or photoionized plasmas. Probably the greatest uncertainty here is for radiative and dielectronic recombination rate coefficients. Careful attention should be given to self-consistency among inverse reactions, such as photoionization cross sections and recombination rates from a Maxwellian velocity distribution.
On a longer timescale, NASA and ESA will undoubtedly push the
frontier of spectroscopy with higher throughput (higher S/N),
higher spectral resolution, and new wavelength bands (especially
the far-UV, the far-IR, and the sub-millimeter). In the X-ray,
the Constellation-X new-mission study offers the chance for
high-throughput X-ray spectrscopy, with attendant requirements
for more accurate wavelengths, oscillator strengths, and
collision strengths for higher-n transitions of elements other
than the usual handful (O, Si, S, Fe). A future far-UV
spectrograph on a 4-6 meter space telescope following Hubble
will provide the opportunity for higher spectral resolution
(
) and unprecedented signal-to-noise for the
detection of weak features of atoms, ions, molecules, and grains.
It will also require wavelengths accurate to better than 10-7,
oscillator strengths and collision strengths for higher ion
stages than the first and second ions, and new data on isotopes
of the abundant elements (e.g., C, S, Fe).
Here too, these new data will accentuate the need for the basic ionization
equilibrium parameters noted above. If there were one major outcome
of this meeting, I would ask NASA to support a long-term program to
define the ionization and recombination rates for all ionization
stages of
astrophysically abundant elements. This
program should be a combination of theoretical computations,
like the Opacity Project and its successor, and careful benchmark
experiments using ion traps and atomic beams.
References:
Arnaud, M., & Rothenflug, R. 1985, Astr. Ap. Suppl., 60, 425.
Brickhouse, N. S. 1996, EUV Spectroscopy of Stellar Coronae, in Atomic Processes in Plasmas, AIP Press, eds. A. L. Osterheld & W. H. Goldstein, Vol. 381, 31-38.
Osterbrock, D. E. 1989, Astrophysics of Gaseous Nebulae and Active Galactic Nuclei, University Science Books.
Shull, J. M. 1993, Physica Scripta, Vol. T47, 165-170.
Shull, J. M. 1996, Atomic Physics for Modeling of Astrophysical Plasmas, in Atomic Processes in Plasmas, AIP Press, eds. A. L. Osterheld & W. H. Goldstein, Vol. 381, 47-55.
Shull, J. M., & Van Steenberg, M. 1982, ApJS, 48, 95.
Sutherland, R. S., & Dopita, M. A. 1993, ApJS, 88, 253.
Acknowledgments:
My astrophysical research at the University of Colorado is supported
by grants from the NASA Astrophysical Theory Program (NAG5-4063), NSF
extragalactic astrophysics (AST96-17173), and the Space Telescope
Science Institute (GO-06593.01-95A).